Process Hacker Forums

Ah! Good to know! Thanks.

It's greyed out for me. And looks like for you too from the screenshot.

It seems this tool, like ProcExp only shows per process tokens. Is there any reason it can't show per thread?

Oh, I see. I've used the ACP of vBulletin in the past, and it offered a way to change the "templates" right inside the web UI. I assumed phpBB did the same. Guess not

Ah I see.

I always thought it's possible to edit the CSS and related stuff without shell access though, just via the control panel that phpBB offers?

Oh ok -- but the bbcode needn't expand to 'inline', it could expand to any inline element you like and (I presume) phpBB should let you edit the CSS corresponding to it. Also, if there's no existing CSS class "inline", then couldn't you define one as you like?

Didn't DrWatson used to do that? I.e. create a dump on crash? I don't know if it still works on Vista+, or whether there's some replacement for it.

You need the [size=number] tag around the code like so

Yes, but shouldn't the default be a suitable size? I think the default is too small, compared to the surrounding default text.

hello world . Hmm.. still same size as before. But thanks for the shorthand 'tt' tag! (Could you tweak the CSS for that class?) Btw, since you'll probably ask evetually, Yes I'm going to evetually add a WYSIWYG post editor Actually, I rather *not* have a WYSIWYG. They make me sick. They break all my...

Can you explain the reasoning for the first point? Isn't the very core of PH tied both conceptually and technically to Win32 at a fundamental level? Why would we want to avoid the use of Win32? It's not like you're going to port PH to Linux?

Does Proc Explorer support suspending processes in XP? If so, how do they do it?

hello

world

foo

As I suspected. P won't do, since P isn't an inline element, but a block-level element. (Aside from not being designed for code).

Wouldn't it be fairly simple to add a short tag like 'tt' or something that expands to <tt> or <code> in phpBB's configuration?

Well, fundamentally for any i18n based design, you'll need to decouple the string's content from its semantics. So any time you need to display a publicly visible string, you'll need to pull it from your i18n abstraction layer. E.g. something like GetLocalString(IDS_SOMETHING), which should look at ...

Should I support adding languages dynamically (without recompilation)? I would say: you don't have to. I don't think loading languages at runtime is a necessary thing to have. (That is, extensible via new DLLs while the app is running). Instead, the app shipping with several string tables baked int...

hello world foo ah, cool! Could you make the font a bit bigger though? (Relative to the text around it, that is) Ideally though, as information theory would suggest, making the bbcode shorter for such a common bbcode would be nice :) Perhaps: 'tt' (corresponding to the html tag name) or similar. BTW...

Is there something I can use for inline code? I.e. without a whole block-level element? But inline with text? E.g. the <tt> or <code> tag without a whole div.

Just thought I'd make a thread to discuss the i18n stuff. Question: Does PH use string table resources for UI-strings currently? If not, does that plus LoadString() sound like a reasonable design choice to support several languages? AFAIK string tables use full (windows native) utf-16 strings, and y...

Thanks a lot for the quick fix! Lots of cool bbcodes too.

Testing

Too small: (c bbcode tag)
[c]int main() {
// foo bar
}[/c]

Good size: (code tag)
EDIT: Ah, it's the C tag, not code.

Can you make it a bit bigger? The same as the code tag, preferably.

How do I do this? In PE I just click Verify in the process image tab.