Process Hacker Forums

Hi, its off topic to PH but a question of interest: How can such a chip design flaw survive over (~15) years without being corrected? All that "software" fixes are AFAIK no real solution to this and just (temporary) "patches". IMHO the only fix to this is a new chip design and by...

Dear afrikan, the existence of a terminator isnt bad at all or useless. I didnt say that. There are reasons one can use it or try to ernforce the termination of a "not behaving as expected" process for the price of breaking the system or data. I personally think that a user mode TerminateP...

TETYYS wrote:

dmex wrote:

Theres always the option of the free Win10 upgrade offer (before it expires this July)

i'd better be crucified than to accept that offer

Why?

viksoftru wrote:

You can upgraded Vista up to Seven and this upgrade fix many OS error., but 32/64 bit WINNT software can work on Win7. I tested.

yes, thats possible. upgrading from xp to 10 is also possible, but both ways are not for free.

At first i was wondering why the terminator was removed, but after thinking about it, i personally think that it is a good choice. If i remember right, there where some unsafe (kernel) methods that could destabilize/crash the os and that isnt worth terminating a process. Just close all apps and save...

Too bad. I am still using vista and i guess some others, too. But ist your project. You have to decide :-( The stats show approx. 100 users that are still using Vista (which isn't even 0.1% of the total) while the very (very) large majority are Windows 7 users. There's not much point supporting suc...

2.38 and below use KProcessHacker2, KProcessHacker3 included with 2.39 doesn't support Vista. Ok, i see.So i guess it uses some imports from kernel binaries only available in 7+. The APIs are supposed to be supported on Vista but we're dropping support for XP and Vista in the next release (3.0) so ...

2.38 and below use KProcessHacker2, KProcessHacker3 included with 2.39 doesn't support Vista. Ok, i see.So i guess it uses some imports from kernel binaries only available in 7+. The APIs are supposed to be supported on Vista but we're dropping support for XP and Vista in the next release (3.0) so ...

dmex wrote:

2.38 and below use KProcessHacker2, KProcessHacker3 included with 2.39 doesn't support Vista.

Ok, i see.So i guess it uses some imports from kernel binaries only available in 7+.

Hi, at first i was wondering why i wasnt able to view kernel memory and handle stuff after upgrading to the latest PH 2.39.124 on my 32bit vista system, even by using an elevated PH. After some investigation i found out that the KPH driver (ver. 3.0.0) wasnt loaded. Not a big deal i thought...at fir...

dmex wrote:

Have you tried uninstalling Virtualbox, rebooting, deleting those drivers, rebooting again and lastly re-installing Virtualbox?

No, i didnt, but using now the latest PH 2.39.124 with the new dll/api this seems to be fixed. Thanks for your reply.

K.

The version ist "5.0.14.105127"on the main executable. How could that be related to VirtualBox? The VirtualBox NDIS 5 driver overwrites the configuration of your real network adapter after bridged mode is installed (so it can send/receive traffic as your network adapter in bridged mode) a...

What version of Virtualbox do you have installed? Does this only happen when "Show hidden adapters" is disabled? The version ist "5.0.14.105127"on the main executable. How could that be related to VirtualBox? No, this happens also if you select the adapter from the list with the...

Hi, first at all: Thanks for the new PH release! Always gr8 to have it running on a machine! I think i found some bug in the NetAdapters.dll plugin.The plugin works fine so far, i.e. it displays the right data for the selected network interface on the system information window, except that it uses t...

dmex wrote:

Do you still have this bug in any recent versions?

No, i cant remember that it happen again.

God, i hate them,... :twisted: :x :cry: There is something i would ask about the usage of HeapReAlloc (what malloc and realloc also internally uses on windows): Is it possible that there will be memory fragmentation while using them (i guess its very likely) and do i have to HeapCompact on the heap ...

janstetka wrote:

Or you could use http://process-history.co.uk

Please fix the 32-Bit executables download link

Hi, i am aware of the fact that a COM server is/can be a ordinary PE file when it comes to its internals, but i am looking for a way to make sure that some unknown PE file is a COM server, not only by depending on its extension like exe, dll or ocx and not only by probing for exports like DllGetClas...

wj32 wrote:

What's wrong with using AdjustTokenPrivileges?

Yes, thats it, you are right

Zorkov Igor wrote:

There are not a lot of code to translate.

The code works perfect, thank you again. I have one more question: How can i enable a single Token Privilege that is available but disabled by default on the aquired token?

Thanks in advance,...

K.