Process Hacker Forums

What happened with Process Hacker? Why did it need a rebrand apart from the fact that word "hacker" = bad to general public? Does that mean the project now has more influence from some other people or companies? How does microsoft and their policy on blocking Process Hacker fit in here? Ho...

shortcut to close a window in Windows is Alt+F4

You need to stop KProcessHacker3 service

That's not a surprise, if you close Process hacker for restart, who's launch it again?

Try playing with "Enable cycle-based CPU usage" setting

There is not, because Process Monitor is not Process Hacker. They perform different functions and for program Process Hacker is, it does not make sense to add such functions

Have you considered using Wireshark?

Looks retro, I like it

open project click build

no it doesn't. this doesn't give any information about the problem whatsoever

Process Hacker can remove open handles on a file, but does not delete any files or modify their permissions.

Process' priority is not a permanent setting, they reset after program restart, if you haven't selected to save it in Process Hacker for specific executable.

For a temporary solution, you can suspend the process instead of terminating it, for a permanent solution, you can replace the service executable itself with a program that does nothing or is invalid.

You can modify resource information of a binary EXE file using any resource editor.

I think most AVs have standalone uninstall tools on their websites, but last time I've seen someone use one of those, windows had to be reinstalled because it was broken completely.

you could try searching games' memory for specific strings or byte blocks that could identify an auto clicker

You can change service configuration by following command: sc config <service name> start=<mode>

In process hacker.

Of course it can because safe mode doesn't load all drivers in the first place

It's not a device driver. You can find it through Services tab, but driver stopping or deletion itself is probably protected by same driver